Most of the Brentford Ransom children attended the British School in Brentford later renamed Rothschild School. There was an annual show to raise money for the British School and these gained favourable reviews in the local press. There is mention of Herbert, Arthur, Maud, Beatrice and George in the newspaper reviews over a few years.

The Brentford British School is just behind the trees, set back a little from the road. Dated around 1905/7

Middlesex Independent 1st December 1900:

Middlesex Independent 30th November 1901:

Middlesex Independent 13th May 1903:

Middlesex Independent 10 February 1904:

The following photographs are taken in years after the Brentford Ransom’s left school but let us see what it was like in the classroom’s. The photographs are from the Healey family’s collection supplied by Tony Healey to the Brentford High Street Project site:

Rothschild School photo, c. 1921/2
Rothschild School photo, c. 1921/2
Rothschild School photo, c. 1925

The following information describing the Brentford British School was written by David Shavreen. The original post can be found here: https://brentfordandchiswicklhs.org.uk/brentford-chiswick-local-history-journal-14-2005/the-rothschild-school-at-brentford/

The Rothschild School at Brentford

by David Shavreen, Brentford & Chiswick Local History Journal 14 (2005)

H G Wells, in one of his stories, expresses the view that the new Board schools that had just begun to sprout all over London were lighthouses illuminating the darkness in which most youngsters lived until the passing of the Education Act of 1870. The nation had resisted the call for a national system of education. Plato, still regarded as an important teacher in government circles had proclaimed that those that had no proclivities for abstract thought, were incapable of profiting from formal instruction and the Church was doubtful of the wisdom of offering to mankind the fruit of the tree of knowledge and baulked at teaching them more than the Bible and the Catechism with perhaps a little needlework for the girls and some bookkeeping for the boys.

However, in Brentford Mrs Trimmer had already launched a school, under the influence of Robert Raikes and the Sunday School movement, which was to be a pioneer with its emphasis on new texts which she wrote for moral guidance telling stories about the wild life in the countryside around the town. She was a stout defender of the Established Church and feared that dissenting voices might weaken the hold of the Church if the children were to lack the proper guidance. For much the same reason the Vicar of Ealing had combined with others to start a boys’ school in Brentford that had opened its doors in 1815. This spiritual contest was replicated across the whole nation and resulted in the founding of rival societies for the development of schools, the two main ones being the National Society for The Education of the Poor in the Principles of the Established Church and the British and Foreign Schools Society founded by the Quaker Joseph Lancaster. After the Government had announced, in 1813, that it was prepared to offer £20,000 to help pay for new school buildings, a group of local people decided to open a British School in Brentford.

The town had long had a reputation for immorality and drunkenness. Brewing was one of the major industries and drinking the products one of the major preoccupations of its citizens, who for the most part earned their livings in menial and poorly paid tasks. Their homes were often wooden shacks without proper sanitation – breeding grounds for diseases like smallpox, dysentery and tuberculosis. Yet it was the factory owners who, influenced no doubt by their religious beliefs and their concern for the poor, began to look to education to bring some hope of an ordered existence into the town. It was thus with some hope that the Rev Muscett appealed to the British and Foreign Society: ‘to render us assistance, in a town long distinguished for gross ignorance and immorality in establishing large and efficient schools.’

Brentford's British School, later known as the Rothschild School (Chiswick Local Studies)

Brentford’s British School, later known as the Rothschild School (Chiswick Local Studies)

The response was positive and in 1834 the British School opened in Spring Gardens, just east of the present County Court. It had separate rooms for the boys and the girls and was to be run on monitorial lines where as many as a hundred children could be taught by one master or mistress, utilising monitors (the brighter children) to transmit the lessons to smaller groups. It was not a system calculated to excite the children but education had always been regarded as a privilege to be enforced with the birch and other sadistic punishments. One change now introduced was the institution of rewards for good conduct so that the possibility that children might actually enjoy their schooling was already being entertained.

The moving spirits of the enterprise were local industrialists like James Montgomrey, who owned a large timber yard where Heidelbergs now stands. He was President of the Committee with Charles Cross, a co-partner in the Thames Soap Works in Ferry Lane as Secretary. Cross was sufficiently interested to make weekly visits to the school to observe progress. Others were the Cunningtons, also soap makers, and Charles Croxford who owned the Royal Brewery which stood where Watermans Arts Centre is today. Contributions for the funds were also made by the local Philanthropic Society and the Brentford Working Men’s Club. An inspector from the old police station would come from time to time to supervise the drill classes, for the curriculum took wing as time progressed.

The purposes for which the British and Foreign Society had originally been founded were the promotion of ‘the education of the Labouring and Manufacturing Classes of Society of every religious persuasion’. The schools’ interdenominational character was to be of particular importance to Brentford’s British School since its most powerful patrons were to be the wealthy Jewish Rothschilds who were shortly to arrive in Gunnersbury. The absence of religious tests appealed to dissenters of every social class, but particularly to the wealthy industrialists who looked to educate their children in knowledge more adapted to the industrial world they inhabited than the Bible and the Catechism which still formed the staple fare in Church schools.

Opening of the school
The school began with 100 or so boys but almost at once began to grow as new boys were admitted every week. The number of girls (who were in a separate building) also increased. Within ten years it was reported that 1,000 boys and 900 girls had passed through altogether.

The annual report for 1846 sets out the subjects studied: ’12 learn the Alphabet, 24 read lessons in one syllable, 21 read easy Scripture lessons, 68 read the Bible, 42 are instructed in English History, 79 in General History and Geography and 27 are taught Grammar and the elements of Science, 104 are taught Arithmetic, 61 write in copy books and 28 of the elder boys are taught Mechanical and Map Drawing.’ The subjects were taught to both boys and girls and received the approval of the inspectors who had been appointed by the government in 1833 when the first tentative approaches had been made to establish some control over church schools.

In 1846 the monitorial system had been modified by the introduction of the pupil-teacher system under which apprentices could be paid out of government funds. They had to be at least 13 when appointed. They would serve for five years and then be entitled to training at a teachers’ training college. The Brentford school was to make increasing use of such teachers. There were also ‘stipendiary monitors’ who did not wish to be apprentices but who would continue to act as monitors until the age of 17, earning between £5 and £12.10s (£12.50p) a year.

The Rothschilds arrived at Gunnersbury in 1835 and almost at once began to take an interest in the school. They were appalled by the conditions they discovered at Brentford and began at once to extend a helping hand. In 1846 the school recorded that Baroness de Rothschild of Gunnersbury House, Brentford had contributed £20 and organised tea parties and outings for the children as well as being the most generous contributor to the Clothing Club. This club represented the first organised practical attempt to deal with the dire needs of parents who could only afford to dress their children in rags and cast-offs. In November 1851 it was stated ‘that a Clothing fund had been established by the Baroness and that 50 girls had been provided with materials and had made new clothes’. It adds: ‘the Baroness wished the number increased and would happily provide the funds. This would be such an addition to the usual work in the school and the number of girls in attendance having much increased lately that Miss Smith required an Assistant Teacher or must be under the necessity of giving up the Clothing Fund’. Such a possibility was not to be considered so the school advertised for an assistant at a projected cost of £40 a year.

The income of the school, however, was very dependent on the weekly payments of the children. These ranged from a penny from the poorest to 9d from the children of the more wealthy. Absence meant a loss of income and the school did its best to round up missing pupils by sending out letters or assistants to visit the children’s homes. The records list many causes of absence: attendance fell off in the afternoons when energy for school lessons was dissipated by domestic duties or hunger; in winter the school was cold and illness was rife. Poor sanitation and lack of clean water meant that smallpox and tuberculosis took their toll and infectious diseases were common. Work in the fields such as spring sowing or gathering the harvest meant children were withdrawn from school to provide cheap labour, and high days and holidays, like the Brentford Fair, were opportunities for some families to profit from rich pickings. However, the expanding population as families became larger and health began to improve, meant the school was bursting at the seams and larger premises were necessary.

The new school building
It was to Baron Lionel de Rothschild that the school committee turned, in 1857, for advice and assistance in finding a new site for the school. A suitable site was found in Brentford High Street opposite Montgomrey’s timber yard (where Alexandra House now stands). Baroness Evelina de Rothschild, a younger daughter of Baroness Charlotte laid the foundation stone and the new school was completed by July 1859. At the party to celebrate the occasion, tea and cakes were served in the two schoolrooms and there was vocal and instrumental music, directed by the schoolmaster Mr Crampton. There was also a party for 160 adults held in the Town Hall. The following motion was proposed at the annual meeting of the Committee in 1860 ‘That the thanks of this meeting be presented to Baron and Baroness Lionel de Rothschild, Mrs Fisher and other donors by whose generosity the Committee had been enabled to erect the ample buildings in which we are now assembled.’ As the illustration shows it was a handsome building in the mock Elizabethan style much favoured by Victorian architects for school buildings.

It was an unpropitious time however for progressive education since in 1858 the Newcastle Commission had been set up to report on measures likely to ‘extend sound and cheap elementary education to all classes of people’. It was back to basics with a vengeance. The Commission recommended that financial aid given to any school should depend on the pupils’ mastery of the three Rs as measured by the inspectors, and the records of attendance. Poor results would lead to a reduction in the government grant. The system became known as ‘Payment by Results’ and was considered a disastrous plan by Matthew Arnold, the son of the reforming Head of Rugby School, who thought it would reduce education to a meaningless ritual in which teachers were forced to concentrate on results which could only be obtained by rote learning of the most mechanical kind and the degradation of the teaching to memory work. Wealthy schools alone could continue to provide a stimulating curriculum.

Fortunately Brentford British School fell into this category. It retained a percentage of children from comfortable homes and, contrary to the general trend that saw a disastrous drop in the number and quality of teachers, was able to increase its teaching staff. In 1860, in addition to the Head, there were five pupil teachers and four auxiliary and occasional teachers. By 1870 the number of pupil-teachers had increased to eight and the school had received the approval of Matthew Arnold himself.

In 1866 Evelina de Rothschild suddenly died in childbirth and the Rothschild family was plunged into grief. To commemorate her daughter’s interest in education, her mother had marble tablets placed in both the boys’ and girls’ schools and founded the Evelina Prize of £5 awarded annually to the best child in the school for ‘punctuality and regularity in attendance, abilities in study and general good conduct’.
In subsequent years the Rothschilds’ contribution became of a much more light-hearted nature. Entertainment was provided at Christmas usually in the form of a magic lantern show with cakes, buns and oranges for the children. James Montgomrey, Chairman of the Committee provided the lantern and the Rothschilds the food. Later, a zoescope, the forerunner of moving pictures, was provided. There were special excursions to see the wedding of Princess Mary of Cambridge and to watch the Oxford and Cambridge University Boat Race. A cricket club was formed and, in 1869, a drum and fife band.

The curriculum developed and began to reflect some of the practices of foreign schools. There were also early lessons in simple science, although science was frowned on by many who believed that a Classical education wedded to Greece and Rome should take priority.

When Baroness Rothschild died in 1884 two thousand Brentford people are said to have gathered at the gates of Gunnersbury Park for the start of her funeral procession to Willesden. By 1906 the school had been renamed the Rothschild School in her honour.

An inspection of the school in 1894 described it in the following terms: ‘Brentford British School was a highly successful, disciplined and happy school which had never abandoned the cultivation of the intellect in a stimulating environment with its varied curriculum and its interest in play and entertainment.’ The Borough of Ealing took over the school in 1919 and it closed in 1930 when Brentford Secondary Modern School was opened. The building was demolished in 1936. Alexandra House, the Community Resources Centre, now covers part of its site.

David Shavreen lives in Brentford and taught for over 40 years, mainly in schools in Brentford, Chiswick and Tottenham.

School Certificate Example (Not from a Ransom but another pupil some years before the Ransom children attended). This is from the website The Brentford High Street Project (https://www.bhsproject.co.uk/sampleschoolcert.shtml)

Brentford British School Certificate 1894

Certificate has ornate surrounds and reads: This is to certify that Jane Richardson has passed the highest Standard in Reading, Writing, Arithmetic, English Grammar, Recitation, Geography, Mapdrawing and Music and that her conduct has been Excellent
The pupil
The certificate was awarded to Jane Richardson who was born 18 September 1880 and therefore aged 13 when she received the certificate. She was the daughter of a bailiff from Isleworth and married John Tazewell Lockyer in 1904. There are two other certificates for Jane:

1895 This is to certify that Jane Elizth Richardson has been examined by H.M. Inspector and passed in the ordinary subjects of Standard 7 and also in English Grammar & Composition, Geography, Map Drawing and Music and that her conduct has been Excellent. Winner of Needlework Prize. The signatories were the same as in 1894.

1896 This is to certify that Jane Richardson has attained the highest standard in the above school, is proficient in the ordinary subjects of the Code and also in English Grammar, Composition, Map Drawing, Geography, Music, Needlework and the use of the sewing machine, also that her conduct has been Excellent’. This was signed by Emma Phillips, head teacher and John Meyers, secretary.

In 1901 Jane was living with her parents, Mark & Eliza and four younger brothers at 9 Glenhurst Road, Old Brentford. She was a tailoress.

The signatories
Head teacher: Emma Phillips appears in the 1881 census living in The Butts and in the 1891 and 1901 censuses living in Windmill Road. She was from Nuneaton Warwickshire and was married to Evan Phillips. They were ‘certificated teachers’ in 1881 and ‘head schoolmaster’ and ‘head schoolmistress’ in the 1891 and 1901 censuses. Emma and Evan (who was from Brecon, Wales) had a family of four sons aged 3 to 13 in 1891. The 1894 trade directory confirms Evan and Emma were the British School head teachers. By 1911 Evan Phillips was still the boy’s head master but Emma had been replaced by Miss Brace, head mistress. In 1914 Evan Phillips served on the Urban District Council.

The ages of Evan and Emma in successive censuses vary considerably: in 1881 they were 24 and 36; in 1891 45 and 46; in 1901 44 and 46. In 1911 the couple were aged 54 and 55 and were living at Grosvenor House, Brentford, a property with 12 rooms. Evan was ‘Headmaster Rothschild School’. (Thanks to Muriel Wallington for providing the 1911 census image).

Checks of earlier censuses and central registration records suggest Emma was born Emma Taberer in Nuneaton in 1844. In 1861 she was living with her mother and step father in Nuneaton and was a ‘Pupil Teacher National School’. By 1871 her mother was widowed and living in Cardiff in the Canton area. Emma was a ‘National Schoolmistress’ aged 26. Interestingly, Evan Phillips was aged just 14 in this census and was also living in the Canton district of Cardiff with his parents. Evan was a ‘Pupil Teacher’. Whatever their relationship at the outset, they married in the July – September quarter of 1876 in the Newport Registration District, by which time Evan would have been 19 or 20 and Emma around 32.

Secretary: John Meyers lived at ‘The Lindens’, Boston Road, with his wife Martha and family in 1891. He was a gardener & florist, born in Brentford. When he signed the certificate in 1894 he would have been about 62 years old. In 1901 he is recorded as a retired market gardener, still living with his wife at 73 Boston Road. John Meyers served as a Brentford Local Board member.

President: Leopold de Rothschild was a descendant of the Rothschild family who gave the land for the British Schools. He lived at Acott House, Wing, Buckinghamshire in the 1891 and 1901 censuses and was a merchant banker. He bought Gunnersbury House in 1889 and died in 1917.

Brentford Rothschild School, 1906:

Source: The image and text taken from Brentford High Street Project site: Andrew Hood, grandson of Edison Whitaker Hood, provided this photo, an early school photo showing 19 boys of various ages – the youngest could be 7 or 8 – with two masters; possibly the elder is the headmaster. The boys are thought to be rowers and the photo is likely to include Andrew’s grandfather, who also appears in photos of 1913 when he was a member of the Brentford Conservative Rowing Club.This photo was taken by Wakefield of Brentford, possibly in his studio – the background looks rather ornate for a school hall. The boys at the front are barefoot; did they walk along the High Street from their school to the studio? Several of the boys have metal badges and in a few cases the ‘R S’ for Rothschild School is embroidered on their vests.

A bit of history on the headteacher Mr Evan Phillips who was headmaster at the time the Ransom children went to the school can be found here:

https://www.bhsproject.co.uk/cllr_ephillips.shtml